The constructionist learning theory is based on constructing or developing something that helps students become active in their own learning. Dr. Michael Orey suggests that it is a theory based on people learning best when they build artifacts they can share with others (Laureate Education, Inc. 2009). How does this link to or perhaps change our instructional strategies? We need to offer our students tools to use in this building process. These tools can range from application software such as Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, and Publisher to Web sites or Internet searches. It can also include content specific software or simulations.
Any tools students can use to construct and be engaged in their learning would connect with constructivism/constructionism. The focus is to make learning more hands-on and tailored to each learner. Orey (2001) offers: "Instruction is only effective when the learners can relate personally and take something away from it" (p. 2). The constructivist theory was initially developed by Jean Piaget and addresses that each learner's understanding is unique and based on their experiences. His building blocks of learning include: assimilation, accommodation, equilibration, and schema (Laureate Education, Inc. 2009).
Constructivism/Constructionism's framework is that learning takes place in a more learner-centered environment as opposed to a teacher-centered environment. In our resources, there were many examples of how our students can become committed and enthusiastic about their learning through the process of exploring, designing, and solving real-world problems. One example was in the use of simulations to replicate real-life situations. Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski (2007) add: "Simulation software also can provide incredibly engaging learning environments, resulting in increased motivation and retention in learning" (p. 213). An instructor's role would be to make sure all students understand both the expectations and also the various methods to be utilized when constructing their artifacts. Teachers need to become managers of the projects their students are developing.
Instructional strategies for constructivist/constructionist-based activities rely on students taking ownership and becoming accountable and responsible for their knowledge while teachers are the guides in this process and offer direction. Orey (2001) adds: "In effect, this cognitive mentorship helps students organize the direction of their learning as well as understand how their strategies connect to the broader goal of solving the overall problem" (p. 6). Project-based, problem-based, and inquiry-based activities are instructional strategies that all utilize the concept of our students using tools to create and build their own base of knowledge.
Here is a link to read more about Jean Piaget and his learning theories: http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/piaget.html
References
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2009). Program seven. Constructionist and Constructivist Learning Theories [Motion picture]. Bridging learning theory, instruction, and technology. Baltimore: Author.
Orey, M.(Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K. (2007). Using technology with classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wanda, so many of our students are hands-on learners and this theory certainly supports this type of learning. The types of students that I work with do not have the most success through traditional strategies of teaching. They have had a history of failure academically therefore it is very important for me to use project-based instruction. They are very intelligent kids, they just learn differently. They are very creative and enjoy interaction through projects. Awesome blog! Kristin
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteKristin
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for your comments! Most of my students also learn best with project-based activities. One of my classes is working on a group PowerPoint project this week, and it has been so fun to see the excitement and motivation increase--they have "come alive". Several students have even worked on the projects from home because they enjoy this type of work. The times I was given a project to work on in school I felt the same way. Also, you and I have talked about how we enjoyed putting together a wiki and found it to be really creative. I have found that when I involve my students in projects, they exceed my expectations.
Wanda
Wanda,
ReplyDeleteI agree with the whole idea that teachers need to be more of a guider when making students do constructionist projects. Our primary job is to make sure that we do not give them the answers, but we give them all the tools form them to find the answers. This can be harder skill for teacherst to develop, but can be way more effective as they are discovering themselves instead of being told the answer and have to study and remember it. One thing that I would like to add to your original post is that we must "make sure that students can explain their hypotheses and conclusions"(Pitler, Hubbell, Kuhn, & Malenoski, 2007, p.203). Make sure that every student can do this can be difficult. Maybe having the students finish the project with a presentation or some kind of assessment that allows us teachers to make sure that every student understood what they were finding and what the answers was.
Bryan
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E., Kuhn, M., & Malenoski, K., Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Bryan
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for adding your thoughts to my post! You are absolutely right that we need to make sure we are properly assessing the progress and participation of all of our students. In project-based or group activities, it would be possible to just assume everyone in the group has a firm understanding when that might not be the case. I like your idea of having our students give presentations to demonstrate their findings, solutions, or grasp of the concepts.
Also, some students make it very easy to be a facilitator during projects and others want to be led a little more. I have found that pairing the first type of student with the second type can help to build up confidence and self-esteem.
going back to what Bryan said regarding hypotheses and conclusions another gimmick that reinforces this weeks learning theories are something I have always called the "anti-answer" in which I deliberately provide students with a flawed hypothesis conclusion or procedure and their task is to correct the flaws or predict the outcomes of a flawed project and or experiment.
ReplyDeleteNorm
ReplyDeleteThanks so much for your input! Your anti-answer activity sounds like a great real-world lesson. I do something similar in an Excel class that I teach. When we are learning about the "What-If" analysis feature, I will enter false information to see if anyone can spot it. It gives students practice in checking for accuracy, reliability, and logic.
Wanda,
ReplyDeleteI have witnessed first hand on how much hands-on activities make students more successful when they can build their own ideas. I currently teach 10th grade math and I have can see a difference in quiz/test/classwork scores when I teach a lesson that is hands-on/exploring than a chalk and talk lesson. Students are able to grasp the concept so much better when they physically see what is going on rather than hearing it. I have also found that students are more engaged and engaged to learn. They are actually enjoying math class if you can believe it or not! I feel the educational world needs to take this into consideration and make technology more available to teachers on a daily basis. Not only do I think it would increase test scores, it would also help us educators to get our students ready for what’s ahead in the real-world.
Emily
Emily
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your insights! You are so right that in order to prepare our students for the kinds of skills they will need in the future, we need to expose them to activities that strengthen their interpersonal skills. Being able to appropriately communicate via many channels will be an asset to prospective employers.